Meggie! (rivulet) wrote,
Meggie!
rivulet

Not sure if I mentioned this either, but the other day I finished the books for the reunion. As soon as I find my pad of paper I can figure out how long it took me. Aha, there it is.

Let's break it down chronologically.
I typed the letters up from copies of handwritten ones Jim wrote - 20 minutes on average for each letter (of which there are 55) - total of 18 hours.

Cory did the layout on his computer several times, because he'd get a draft done and send it to Jim for editing, and he'd have to redo the layout each time - 15 hours.

Cory designed maps of the area based on maps that a friend of Sally drew, based on maps that Jim drew - 8 hours.

Cory and I read through the whole thing to make sure we didn't miss anything, cross-referencing names for consistent spelling and other such things - 4 hours.

We went to Cory's work at night one night and printed and copied all of the pages - 2 hours.

I spent 4 minutes folding the pages (32 pages for each book, I think) into 9 signatures, 5 minutes poking holes down each crease in each signature, about 30 minutes sewing the signatures together - 19.5 hours.

I glued the edges of the pages together (where I sewed), glued the spines on, and glued the covers on - 10 hours.

Lastly I taped the spines with black duct tape (it looks better than it sounds) to reinforce them and make them a little more interesting - 2 hours.

So the total hours we spent on the project (not including the times that we sent edits to Jim and waited for a week or two to get them back and that sort of thing) is 68.5. I started typing (not earnestly though) in January, and we got three groups of letters throughout the spring and into the summer. And I started binding I think at the beginning of July or the end of June.
Tags: crafts
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments